Wisenschaftskritische Essays

[Chlorobium]

Mal eine kleine Anregung zum Verständnis für die Sichtweise(n) der "Cranks". Bin durch Zufall auf dieses Dokument gestoßen und habe es mal etwas quergelesen. Zwar habe ich noch nicht alle enthaltenen Aufsätze durch, was bei dem ganzen Gejammer auch recht schwer ist, mir ist aber der Aufsatz von Bauer auf Seite 167 über "Ethics in Science" aufgefallen. Einige dort enthaltenen Aussagen haben mich doch zum Nach- und Überdenken von wissenschaftlichen Positionen oder Mechanismen angeregt.
_________________
mfg
Chlorobium (der Farbe wegen)

[JANm]

At page 50 I was already tired and jumped to you 167. Can't understand how that can be "anregend". I'm not so much in the habit anymore in getting filosofical. But the non-thinking therapy of Teacher Chrisnamurti I need sometimes to stop the machine. If the thinking-machine gets in circles then there is no need in continuing. That I have of Graphtheorie solving quest-puzzles.
I don't know how you can call this page as by Bauer, while I think it is introduced as M. Apostol.
Is it realy true that psychologist don't know anything about meta-thinking.
If i'am tired and go to bed is that only instinct or does it come from the knowledge that the results from my thinking will be (again) such a genial thing that I just forget to write down...
I am of the conviction that there is thinking, the passive uninteractive proces that M. Apostel describes here is interluded with meta-thinking=
going on or stop or changing color or direction whatever CHOOSING a path wich I stear. Of course I cannot say that the VOLKSWAGEN I use for thinking is no different from collegae man (or woman for this matter) and that the continous proces of thinking is active and passive at the same time as if it were a train on a rail with no wissles
greeting
_________________
Weiss nicht viel aber was ich weiss benutze ich.